AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Real war hammer1/23/2024 Automakers can chose between running a two-cycle test-where the data is multiplied by a standard 0.7 adjustment factor-or carrying out a five-cycle test in an attempt to earn a smaller reduction factor, making the label figure higher. The EPA's highway cycle is conducted at significantly lower speeds than Car and Driver's 75-mph test, with the initial EPA results then multiplied by a reduction factor to simulate the effect of higher speeds. While this is detrimental to the results for gas vehicles, which tend to be most efficient at a steady rpm, the ability to regenerate energy under braking leads to higher range results for EVs, which are shifted even higher by the slight bias towards the city results in the combined rating. Unlike Car and Driver's real-world test-carried out at a constant 75 mph-the EPA's cycle is variable, with the speed increasing and decreasing over the course of the test. The way the tests are conducted also skews the reported range figure. 10 Ways to Squeeze the Most Range From an EV.EV Range Can Be Very Different from EPA Numbers.But the average range for an EV was 12.5 percent worse than the price sticker numbers. On Car and Driver's 75-mph highway test, more than 350 internal-combustion vehicles averaged 4.0 percent better fuel economy than what was stated on their labels. The real question is: When first-time customers are buying EVs, are they going to be pleasantly surprised or disappointed by the range?" "We see a big difference in that gap between gas-powered vehicles and the performance of EVs. "Basically we've taken a look at how vehicles perform relative to the values on the window sticker, looking at the difference between what the label says and what we actually see in our real-world highway test," explained VanderWerp. It points to a need for revised testing and labeling standards for EVs moving forward. The paper, written by Car and Driver's testing director, Dave VanderWerp, and Gregory Pannone, was presented this week at SAE International's annual WCX conference. While the latter typically meet or exceed the EPA-estimated highway fuel economy numbers, EVs tend to fall considerably short of the range number on the window sticker. The authors propose solutions like more standardized testing procedures and the inclusion of both city and highway range figures on new vehicles' Monroney price stickers.Ī new paper published by SAE International uses Car and Driver's real-world highway test data to show that electric vehicles underperform on real-world efficiency and range relative to the EPA figures by a much greater margin than internal-combustion vehicles.The paper compares EPA fuel-economy and range estimates to the results of C/D's real-world highway tests, with EVs failing to meet the EPA's range figures on average. SAE International has just published a paper co-authored by C ar and Driver's testing director, Dave VanderWerp, showing that, in our testing, EVs are far worse at matching EPA estimates than gas-powered vehicles.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |